Notes about Linking
To illustrate some points about how linking
can work for you, I provide a few examples.
First, I searched Google for "tennis court
lighting japan". I am attempting to demonstrate the power of linking
by using rlldesign.com as an example, so I looked for a Facebook
listing for that site. The 5th site listed (organically, we are not
interested in paid listings!) referred to "Tanamatsu, Tagawa Japan-
Tennis Court Lighting Case Study | Facebook", which I knew to be the
kind of page I was looking for.
Clicking on that listing brought me to a
Facebook page describing the
building of a tennis court in Japan. I opened the source view of
the page and did a search for "rlldesign" in the code and found ten
occurrences. In other words, there were 10 links on this single page
back to various pages on the rlldesign site. This demonstrates how
"link rich" creating Facebook pages can be.
I noted that the source code reflected that
all the links were tagged as "nofollow", which should indicate that
these links are not helpful, but other evidence counters that. The
Wikipedia article on nofollow
tags points out how complex the rules are for the application of
this tag. The bottom line is that it is not determinative, but can
be applied in different ways.
A
Google search for links to rlldesign.com found at least 4
occurrences of Facebook pages in the listing. This demonstrates
conclusively that Google is, in fact, indexing the links from
Facebook pages and including them in a site's link count.
Another good source of links can be found in
sites that accept articles for publication. The link search cited
above returned a number of locations where articles are creating
links for this site. A partial list includes:
The occurrence of these sites in the search
results indicates that articles have been placed on the sites
linking back to rlldesign, and that those articles are, in fact,
providing link value to the target site.
The recent
Google "Panda" update
changed the effectiveness of many of these sites, but the data
is not really in yet on which survived the change and which did not.
The goal of the update seemed to be to reduce the impact of low
quality sites like these, while leaving intact the significance of
higher quality sites in the group. Current reporting seems to
indicate that there were some "hits" and some "misses in the
strategy, with commentators asking why certain sites that seemed to
be higher quality took a hit while others of lower quality did not.
This debate will certainly continue, and there may be some
adjustments to the algorithm on the way.
This list could be considered a guide to sites
where articles might be effectively placed for your site, but the
caution that goes with that statement is that you have to look for
indications of quality in the articles that you see on the site
before you invest your resources in placing articles there. Later
there may be more information available on which of these sites were
really affected by the update and which were not. |